Assessment of lichen and moss cover using percentage cover estimation
Puig-Gironès, R. 1,2
1 Institut de la Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBIO)
2 Departament of Evolutive Biologu, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona
Last updated: 23/09/2023
Recommended citation:
Roger Puig-Gironès. 2026. Assessment of lichen and moss cover using percentage cover estimation. In: Pere Casals, Davide Ascoli, Lena Vilà-Vilardell, Imma Oliveras, Madoka Krick (eds.) 2026. Methods handbook for characterizing fire use behavior, assessing fire effects, and monitoring soil and vegetation responses at the stand level. FIRE-ADAPT project (number 101086416), deliverable D1.1
Indicator
Ecosystem responses: Vegetation responses
Brief introduction
Lichens and mosses are key components of ground-layer vegetation, playing a crucial role in soil protection, moisture regulation, and nutrient cycling. They are particularly sensitive to fire disturbance and can serve as reliable indicators of ecosystem recovery and environmental change.
This method provides a standardised and repeatable approach to quantify lichen and moss cover using percentage cover estimation within fixed sampling units, allowing for comparisons across time, treatments, and sites.
Percentage cover of lichens and mosses is visually estimated within predefined plots or quadrats. Cover can be assessed either jointly or separately, depending on study objectives.
Timing in relation to fire
- Pre-fire / Control: Establish baseline community composition
- During fire: Not applicable
- Short-term post-fire (≤1 year): Assess immediate fire impact and survival
- Long-term post-fire (>1 year): Monitor recovery dynamics and succession
Repeated seasonal measurements are recommended where feasible.
Method specifications
Method type
Soft
Hard
Method timing
Before
fire
During
fire
After fire
(short-term)
After fire
(mid-term)
After fire
(long-term)
Field skills
Low
Medium
Hard
Lab skills
Low
Medium
Hard
Material cost
Low
Medium
Hard
Time cost
Low
Medium
Hard
Calculation expertise
Low
Medium
Hard
Equipment
- Quadrat frame (recommended sizes: 0.5 × 0.5 m or 1 × 1 m)
- Measuring tape
- GPS device
- Field data sheets or digital device
- Identification guides for lichens and mosses
- Camera (optional, for documentation)
Experimental design
Plot selection
- Use systematic, random, or stratified sampling, depending on site heterogeneity
- Ensure representation of key environmental gradients (e.g. burn severity, slope, aspect)
Quadrat placement
- Place quadrats:
- Randomly within plots, or
- At fixed intervals along transects
Replication
- Minimum: 10 quadrats per site or treatment
- Increase replication in highly heterogeneous environments
Methodology
Cover estimation
Estimate the percentage of ground surface covered by:
- Lichens (%)
- Mosses (%)
- Or combined lichen–moss cover (%)
Cover is defined as the vertical projection of living material onto the ground surface.
Estimation methods
- Visual estimation (standard approach):
- Use cover classes (optional), e.g.:
- 0–5%
- 5–25%
- 25–50%
- 50–75%
- 75–100%
- Grid-based quadrats (recommended for higher precision):
- Subdivide quadrat into equal cells
- Count occupied cells to estimate cover
Vegetation and substrate analysis (optional)
This complementary method of assessing substrate coverage provides valuable context for woody debris interactions. This can be linked to debris dynamics, as the structure of the substrate can affect both moisture retention and habitat availability for various species.
- The vegetation data is collected within predefined quadrats (e.g., 50 cm diameter circles, subdivided into 625 cm² squares), and coverage is estimated by counting grid units with ≥50% coverage by bryophytes, lichens, or cyanophytes.
- For substrate types, three categories are defined based on physical characteristics: conglomerates, large pebbles (≥10 cm²), and small pebbles/sand/clay.
- The coverage of each category is measured using ImageJ software, which allows for automated analysis of field photographs.
Sample storage
Not required unless species identification is uncertain.
If samples are collected:
- Store in paper envelopes (avoid plastic)
- Label clearly with location and date
- Air-dry before laboratory identification
Variables recorded
- Site and plot ID
- GPS coordinates
- Date and time
- Fire history / burn severity (if available)
- Quadrat size
- Lichen cover (%)
- Moss cover (%)
- Total ground cover (%)
Optional:
- Species composition
- Substrate type (soil, rock, wood)
- Moisture conditions
Special considerations
- Training and calibration of observers are recommended prior to fieldwork to minimise observer bias and ensure consistency in percentage cover estimates
- Seasonality: Moisture conditions can influence detectability and appearance
- Post-fire conditions: Ash, char, and soil darkening may complicate cover estimation
- Species differentiation: Distinguishing lichens from mosses may require expertise
- Spatial heterogeneity: Increase sampling intensity in patchy environments
- Substrate composition analysis, particularly related to the physical properties of the ground (e.g., conglomerates, pebbles, and finer particles), which influences species distribution and biomass accumulation in rocky ecosystems.
Relation with other methods
Canopy cover estimation using the line-intercept method
Soil stability test
Destructive measurements of litter load
Destructive sampling for litter and duff fuel load C stocks and fire driven changes
Line intersect method to estimate downed woody fuel
Logs fuel load
Data templates
Link to template (NA)
Further information
Elzinga, C. L., & Salzer, D. W. (1998). Measuring & monitoring plant populations. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management..
Gavarró, P., Bros, V., Sáez, L., Santos, X., Real, J., Pons, D., & Puig-Gironès, R. (2026). Evaluating biotic interactions in a hard and fragile ecosystem: xerophilous land snails and epilithic cryptogram communities in rocky outcrops. Acta Oecologica, 130, 104153.
McCune, B., & Grace, J. B. (2002). Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design: Gleneden Beach. ISBN 0-9721290-0-6. 300 pp.
Schindelin, J., Rueden, C. T., Hiner, M. C., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2015). The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Molecular reproduction and development, 82(7-8), 518-529.
Smith, C. W. (2009). The lichens of great Britain and Ireland. London: British Lichen Society.
Smith, R. J., Benavides, J. C., Jovan, S., Amacher, M., & McCune, B. (2015). A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers. The Bryologist, 118(1), 32-45.