Skip to content

Assessment of lichen and moss cover using percentage cover estimation

Puig-Gironès, R. 1,2

1 Institut de la Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBIO)

2 Departament of Evolutive Biologu, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona

Last updated: 23/09/2023

Recommended citation:

Roger Puig-Gironès. 2026. Assessment of lichen and moss cover using percentage cover estimation. In: Pere Casals, Davide Ascoli, Lena Vilà-Vilardell, Imma Oliveras, Madoka Krick (eds.) 2026. Methods handbook for characterizing fire use behavior, assessing fire effects, and monitoring soil and vegetation responses at the stand level. FIRE-ADAPT project (number 101086416), deliverable D1.1

Indicator

Ecosystem responses: Vegetation responses

Brief introduction

Lichens and mosses are key components of ground-layer vegetation, playing a crucial role in soil protection, moisture regulation, and nutrient cycling. They are particularly sensitive to fire disturbance and can serve as reliable indicators of ecosystem recovery and environmental change.

This method provides a standardised and repeatable approach to quantify lichen and moss cover using percentage cover estimation within fixed sampling units, allowing for comparisons across time, treatments, and sites.

 

Percentage cover of lichens and mosses is visually estimated within predefined plots or quadrats. Cover can be assessed either jointly or separately, depending on study objectives.

 

Timing in relation to fire

 

  • Pre-fire / Control: Establish baseline community composition
  • During fire: Not applicable
  • Short-term post-fire (≤1 year): Assess immediate fire impact and survival
  • Long-term post-fire (>1 year): Monitor recovery dynamics and succession

 

Repeated seasonal measurements are recommended where feasible.

Method specifications

Method type

Soft

Hard

Method timing

Before
fire

During
fire

After fire 
(short-term)

After fire
(mid-term)

After fire
(long-term)

Field skills

Low

Medium

Hard

Lab skills

Low

Medium

Hard

Material cost

Low

Medium

Hard

Time cost

Low

Medium

Hard

Calculation expertise

Low

Medium

Hard

Equipment

  • Quadrat frame (recommended sizes: 0.5 × 0.5 m or 1 × 1 m)
  • Measuring tape
  • GPS device
  • Field data sheets or digital device
  • Identification guides for lichens and mosses
  • Camera (optional, for documentation)

Experimental design

Plot selection

  • Use systematic, random, or stratified sampling, depending on site heterogeneity
  • Ensure representation of key environmental gradients (e.g. burn severity, slope, aspect)

Quadrat placement

  • Place quadrats:
  • Randomly within plots, or
  • At fixed intervals along transects

Replication

  • Minimum: 10 quadrats per site or treatment
  • Increase replication in highly heterogeneous environments

Methodology

Cover estimation

Estimate the percentage of ground surface covered by:

  • Lichens (%)
  • Mosses (%)
  • Or combined lichen–moss cover (%)

Cover is defined as the vertical projection of living material onto the ground surface.

 

Estimation methods

  • Visual estimation (standard approach):
  • Use cover classes (optional), e.g.:
    • 0–5%
    • 5–25%
    • 25–50%
    • 50–75%
    • 75–100%
  • Grid-based quadrats (recommended for higher precision):
  • Subdivide quadrat into equal cells
  • Count occupied cells to estimate cover

 

Vegetation and substrate analysis (optional)

This complementary method of assessing substrate coverage provides valuable context for woody debris interactions. This can be linked to debris dynamics, as the structure of the substrate can affect both moisture retention and habitat availability for various species.

 

  • The vegetation data is collected within predefined quadrats (e.g., 50 cm diameter circles, subdivided into 625 cm² squares), and coverage is estimated by counting grid units with ≥50% coverage by bryophytes, lichens, or cyanophytes. 
  • For substrate types, three categories are defined based on physical characteristics: conglomerates, large pebbles (≥10 cm²), and small pebbles/sand/clay. 
  • The coverage of each category is measured using ImageJ software, which allows for automated analysis of field photographs. 

 

Sample storage

Not required unless species identification is uncertain.

If samples are collected:

  • Store in paper envelopes (avoid plastic)
  • Label clearly with location and date
  • Air-dry before laboratory identification

 

Variables recorded

  • Site and plot ID
  • GPS coordinates
  • Date and time
  • Fire history / burn severity (if available)
  • Quadrat size
  • Lichen cover (%)
  • Moss cover (%)
  • Total ground cover (%)

Optional:

  • Species composition
  • Substrate type (soil, rock, wood)
  • Moisture conditions

 

Special considerations

  • Training and calibration of observers are recommended prior to fieldwork to minimise observer bias and ensure consistency in percentage cover estimates
  • Seasonality: Moisture conditions can influence detectability and appearance
  • Post-fire conditions: Ash, char, and soil darkening may complicate cover estimation
  • Species differentiation: Distinguishing lichens from mosses may require expertise
  • Spatial heterogeneity: Increase sampling intensity in patchy environments
  • Substrate composition analysis, particularly related to the physical properties of the ground (e.g., conglomerates, pebbles, and finer particles), which influences species distribution and biomass accumulation in rocky ecosystems.

 

Relation with other methods

Canopy cover estimation using the line-intercept method 

Soil stability test

Destructive measurements of litter load

Destructive sampling for litter and duff fuel load C stocks and fire driven changes

Line intersect method to estimate downed woody fuel

Logs fuel load

Data templates

Link to template (NA)

Further information

Elzinga, C. L., & Salzer, D. W. (1998). Measuring & monitoring plant populations. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management..

Gavarró, P., Bros, V., Sáez, L., Santos, X., Real, J., Pons, D., & Puig-Gironès, R. (2026). Evaluating biotic interactions in a hard and fragile ecosystem: xerophilous land snails and epilithic cryptogram communities in rocky outcrops. Acta Oecologica, 130, 104153.

McCune, B., & Grace, J. B. (2002). Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design: Gleneden Beach. ISBN 0-9721290-0-6. 300 pp.

Schindelin, J., Rueden, C. T., Hiner, M. C., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2015). The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Molecular reproduction and development, 82(7-8), 518-529.

Smith, C. W. (2009). The lichens of great Britain and Ireland. London: British Lichen Society.

Smith, R. J., Benavides, J. C., Jovan, S., Amacher, M., & McCune, B. (2015). A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers. The Bryologist, 118(1), 32-45.